A length is a specified pair of events
Which endpoint measurements define a moving rod’s length?
To measure a moving rod, mark both of its ends at the same time in your own frame. Two marks that are simultaneous in another frame are made at different times in yours, so they do not measure the rod.
A ruler travelling with the rod gives its rest length. An observer the rod moves past has to note where both ends are at the same moment of that observer’s time; marking one end now and the other a little later adds the distance the rod moved in between.
Differences between two events transform by the same map as the events themselves. So a pair with and has , which is not zero for any : what one frame calls simultaneous, the other does not.
Events simultaneous in the unprimed frame have a primed time difference of minus gamma v delta x over c squared.
In the simultaneity laboratory you pick the two end events yourself and see which frame calls them simultaneous. A pair chosen in the wrong frame gives a larger separation, and that does not mean the rod got longer.
Return to which end marks measure a moving rod. (included in this file)
Letters: the rod has length l when measured at rest. Moving with speed v along the X axis toward increasing x, its length measured in the stationary system is , where A and B are its ends; V is the speed of light. The γ, c and primes of the formula below are this explanation's: the paper's §2 argues without the transformation, which it derives only in §3.
- The two principles, as §2 defines them. First: the laws by which the states of physical systems change do not depend on which of two coordinate systems in uniform translation relative to each other they are referred to. Second: every light ray moves in the stationary system with the definite speed V, whether it was emitted by a body at rest or a body in motion, where speed means light path divided by time interval in the sense of §1.
- Operation a: an observer moving with the rod lays a measuring rod along it, exactly as if rod, observer and measuring rod were at rest. By the principle of relativity this gives l, which the paper calls the length of the rod in the moving system.
- Operation b: an observer at rest uses the stationary system's clocks, set by §1's rule, to find where the two ends of the rod are at one given time t, and measures the distance between those two points. That is the length of the moving rod in the stationary system, .
- The kinematics then in general use tacitly assumed that a and b give the same length. The paper sets out to determine b from its two principles, and finds that it differs from l.
- Now put a clock at each end, A and B, in step with the stationary system's clocks, and let observers moving with the clocks apply §1's rule. A ray leaves A at , is reflected at B at , and arrives back at A at .
- Outward, the light chases the receding end B, so the gap closes at : . Coming back, the light meets A moving toward it, so the gap closes at : .
- Worked case: v = 0.6V and = 1 light-second. Out: 1/0.4 = 2.5 seconds. Back: 1/1.6 = 0.625 seconds. The two are unequal, so observers moving with the rod would find the clocks not in step, while observers in the stationary system call them in step.
- So simultaneity has no absolute meaning: two events that are simultaneous seen from one coordinate system are not simultaneous seen from a system moving relative to it.
- To measure a moving rod, therefore, mark both ends at the same time in your own frame. Mark one end, then the other 1 second later while the rod moves at 0.6c, and you add metres, the distance it moved in between.
- Borrowing §3's transformation puts a number on the disagreement. Two events with no time difference in one frame and a separation Δx along the motion have, in the other frame, the time difference below.
Events simultaneous in the unprimed frame have a primed time difference of minus gamma v delta x over c squared.
- Worked: Δx = 1 light-second, v = 0.6c, γ = 1.25: = −0.75 seconds. The minus sign says that, in the moving frame, the event farther along x happens first.
- A measured length is not what a photograph shows. A camera records light that arrives at the same moment, and that light left the two ends at different times.
Return to which end marks measure a moving rod. (included in this file)
Modern qualifications
Einstein’s §2 argues with light signals and clocks and reaches the relativity of simultaneity without the transformation, which he derives only in §3. The formula here borrows §3’s result to put a number on it.
Simultaneous in one system, not in the other
Modern teaching equation, not the equation as printed.
Events simultaneous in the unprimed frame have a primed time difference of minus gamma v delta x over c squared.
Two events at the same time in the stationary system but at different places are, in the moving system, separated in time by this amount. It is the Lorentz map applied to a pair of events with no time between them.
Assumptions
- The rod moves at constant velocity along the direction of motion and keeps its rest length.
- Each frame reads time on its own synchronized clocks.
Limits
- The measured length is not what a photograph of the moving rod would show.
- Choosing a different pair of end events for each frame is the point of the measurement, not a correction to it.