Special relativity · Kinematics §2 & §4

Simultaneity is relative; moving bodies contract.

How does relative motion affect the synchronization of clocks, the coordinate measurement of moving rods, and the shape of moving spheres?

An executable laboratory

Rod measurement, simultaneity, and causal order laboratory

Static worked example

The rod's length in the two frames

The rod is at rest in frame k, the moving frame, and frame K, the platform, measures it, at v = 0.60c. A length is the distance between the two ends read at one time of the measuring frame: coordinate geometry, not what a camera sees.

The two readings are Δx = 10.00 ls and cΔt = 0.00 ls apart in frame K. They are two marks on the platform, not the rod's ends, and simultaneous in frame K, so 10.00 ls is the distance between them there, not the rod's length. The rod itself, its ends read at one time of frame K, is 8.00 ls long there.

Frame K, the platform: 8.00 ls, L₀/γ

Frame k, moving at 0.60c: 10.00 ls, the proper length L₀

Spacetime event diagram of the two end readings

Light lines run at 45°. The moving frame's axes x′ and ct′ tilt toward them by arctan(v/c). Here γ = 1.25 and L₀ = 10.0 ls.

xctx′ct′E₁E₂

Axes in light-seconds. E₁ is at the origin in both frames. E₂ is at (x, ct) = (10.0, 0.0) in frame K and (x′, ct′) = (12.5, -7.5) in frame k.

A moving sphere measured as an ellipsoid (§4)

A sphere of radius R at rest in k, measured from K at one instant of K, has axes R/γ, R and R, that is R√(1 − v²/c²), R and R.

At v = 0.60c the measured axes are 0.80 ls along the motion (the horizontal line), and 1.00 ls and 1.00 ls across it. The dashed circle is the sphere at rest.

Predict before the numbers

At v = 0.6c, two events that mark the ends of a moving 10-ls rod are measured simultaneously in platform frame K (dt = 0, dx = 8 ls). What is their time separation dt' in the rod's rest frame k?

Three relations the model could have

Predict before the numbers

If two events have a timelike separation (s² < 0, so a signal slower than light could connect them), what happens to their time order when viewed from a frame moving at 0.95c?

Three relations the model could have

The result appears when you choose, say you have one in mind, or skip.

Try
Experiment settings speed, frames, rod length, sphere radius, event pair
Frames, speed and sizes
0.60 c
10.0 ls
1.0 ls

Worked example: the two readings are 10 ls and cΔt = 0 ls apart in frame K. They are two marks on the platform, not the rod's ends, and simultaneous in frame K, so 10.00 ls is the distance between them there, not the rod's length. The rod itself, its ends read at one time of frame K, is 8.00 ls long there.

Two flashes that happen at the same moment for one observer happen at different moments for an observer moving past. So a moving rod, whose two ends have to be marked at the same moment to measure it, comes out shorter than the same rod measured at rest.

Section 1 defines when two distant clocks agree: light sent from A to B and reflected back must take as long going as returning. Section 2 applies that test to clocks on the ends of a rod moving at speed v, set to agree with the clocks of the resting system K. Seen from K, the light gains on the receding end B at c − v and meets the approaching end A at c + v, so tB − tA = rAB/(c − v) and t′A − tB = rAB/(c + v). The two times differ, so observers riding with the rod find the clocks out of step, while observers in K call them synchronous. Section 4 turns this into geometry: a sphere of radius R at rest in the moving system k, located at one time of K, is an ellipsoid with axes R√(1 − v2/c2), R and R. The instrument measures in light-seconds with c = 1. At v = 0.6c the factor √(1 − v2/c2) is 0.8, a rod 10 light-seconds long at rest in k measures 8 light-seconds in K, and two events 10 light-seconds apart at one time of K are 7.5 s apart in k.

Modern qualifications

Einstein wrote V for the speed of light, β for the factor now called γ, and ξ and τ for the coordinates of k that this instrument writes x′ and t′; he named the resting system K and the moving one k. The paper cites no one for the shortening. FitzGerald in 1889 and Lorentz in 1892 had proposed that bodies moving through the ether contract along their motion, a physical effect that would account for Michelson and Morley's null result. In Section 4 the same factor follows from the definition of simultaneity and the two principles, and it works both ways, as Einstein says: bodies at rest in K, viewed from k, are shortened in the same ratio. The spacetime diagram in this instrument and the invariant Δx2 − c2Δt2 are Minkowski's, from his lecture of 1908, and appear nowhere in the paper. The ellipsoid is what rulers and synchronized clocks record at one time of K; a camera receives light that left different parts of the body at different times, and Terrell and Penrose showed in 1959 that a fast sphere photographs with a circular outline.

Spacetime event coordinates and invariant interval

FrameΔt (s)Δx (ls)Simultaneitys² = Δx² − c²Δt² (ls²)Causal order
K (Platform)010Simultaneous100Spacelike
k (Moving)−7.512.5Second event earlier100Spacelike

Could one of these events have caused the other? No. Not even light can get from one event to the other in the time between them, so nothing done at one can affect the other, and observers moving differently can disagree about which came first.

Values at these settings

QuantityValue
Distance between the two readings in K, Δx (platform marks, not the rod)10 ls
Time between the events in K, Δt0 s
Distance between the two readings in k, Δx′ (platform marks, not the rod)12.5 ls
Time between the events in k, Δt′−7.5 s
Their time order in Ksimultaneous
Their time order in ksecond event earlier
Distance between the two readings at one time of frame K (platform marks, not the rod)10 ls
The rod's length in K, its ends read at one time of K8 ls
The rod's length in k, its ends read at one time of k10 ls
Are the two readings the rod's ends?no, they are not the rod's ends
Interval, s² = Δx² − c²Δt²100 ls²
Kind of separationspacelike
Lorentz factor, γ1.25
Sphere measured along the motion0.8 ls
Sphere measured across the motion (y)1 ls
Sphere measured across the motion (z)1 ls

What this model leaves out

It applies exact special-relativistic coordinate transformations, coordinate length measurements and invariant intervals between inertial frames. It does not model:

  • Optical camera image appearance (Terrell-Penrose rotation and light-travel-time distortion), which differs from coordinate measurement at a single instant.
  • Accelerating reference frames, Rindler horizons, or Thomas precession.
  • Internal stress, elasticity, Born rigidity breakdown, or relativistic wave propagation during rod acceleration.
  • Gravitational time dilation or spacetime curvature (general relativity).
  • Quantum uncertainty or field fluctuations at Planck-scale event intervals.
  • Superluminal observers (|v| ≥ c) or tachyonic coordinate frames.
Show the code

The site’s own reference code for this law, in TypeScript. It computes the numbers above when the page runs it, and it is what the page uses wherever a FrankenSim result is not available.

measureRodLength · src/physics/reference/events.ts · this site’s source, as built · sha256:e97beaf8ac0d914a0a5e24484d65e0fa3833db6173332226b603634480313930

This function computes the listed outputs when it runs.

In words

A length is the distance between two endpoint events taken AT THE SAME TIME in the frame doing the measuring, so the function checks the time gap before it measures anything. Simultaneous endpoints give the distance between them: a rod of unit proper length, measured from the frame it moves through at six tenths of the light speed, gives 0.8. Endpoints that are not simultaneous give a not-applicable result whose reason says why.

Implementation

export function measureRodLength(
  e1InMeasuringFrame: Event,
  e2InMeasuringFrame: Event,
  measuringFrame: "K" | "k",
  rodRestFrame: "K" | "k",
  v: number,
  L0: number,
  c = C,
): RodMeasurementResult {
  const dt = Math.abs(e2InMeasuringFrame.t - e1InMeasuringFrame.t);
  if (dt > 1e-12) {
    const repair = selectSimultaneousEndpoints(
      rodRestFrame,
      measuringFrame,
      v,
      L0,
      e1InMeasuringFrame.t,
      c,
    );
    return {
      status: "not-applicable",
      isSimultaneous: false,
      condition: "non-simultaneous-endpoints",
      reason:
        "These endpoint events are not simultaneous in the measuring frame, so their separation is not a length measurement.",
      repairSuggestedPair: repair.status === "value" ? repair.value : undefined,
    };
  }

  const measuredLength = Math.abs(e2InMeasuringFrame.x - e1InMeasuringFrame.x);
  return {
    status: "value",
    isSimultaneous: true,
    measuredLength,
  };
}

The site’s own reference code for this law, in TypeScript. It computes the numbers above when the page runs it, and it is what the page uses wherever a FrankenSim result is not available.

causalOrder · src/physics/reference/events.ts · this site’s source, as built · sha256:b756870e17e329d30ef7d9ecf32adc1f17b5b263675e5c7a050475c430aebfb0

This function computes the listed outputs when it runs.

In words

It computes the interval s squared, the spatial separation less the light-travel separation, and classifies. Times are in seconds and distances in light-seconds here, so c is 1 and the arithmetic is readable: one light-second apart at the same time gives s squared of 1 and spacelike; one second apart and one light-second apart gives 0 and lightlike; two seconds and one light-second gives minus 3 and timelike. Each classification comes back with a sentence a reader can use, and the spacelike one says in words that the time order can be reversed by choosing a frame.

Implementation

export function causalOrder(e1: Event, e2: Event, c = C): KinematicResult<CausalOrderResult> {
  if (!finite(e1.t, e1.x, e2.t, e2.x) || !Number.isFinite(c) || c <= 0) {
    return outsideDomain("nonfinite-input", "Event coordinates and light speed must be finite.");
  }
  const dt = e2.t - e1.t;
  const dx = e2.x - e1.x;
  const dy = (e2.y ?? 0) - (e1.y ?? 0);
  const dz = (e2.z ?? 0) - (e1.z ?? 0);

  const spatialDist2 = dx * dx + dy * dy + dz * dz;
  const timeDist2 = c * c * dt * dt;
  const s2 = spatialDist2 - timeDist2;

  let classification: CausalClassification;
  let description: string;

  if (Math.abs(s2) <= 1e-12) {
    classification = "lightlike";
    description = "Events can be connected only by a light signal propagating at speed c.";
  } else if (s2 > 0) {
    classification = "spacelike";
    description =
      "No signal travelling at or below the speed of light reaches between these events; their time order can be reversed by choosing an appropriate moving reference frame.";
  } else {
    classification = "timelike";
    description =
      "A signal could travel from the first of these events to the second; their time order is invariant under all subluminal Lorentz boosts.";
  }

  return ok({
    s2,
    classification,
    description,
  });
}

The site’s own reference code for this law, in TypeScript. It computes the numbers above when the page runs it, and it is what the page uses wherever a FrankenSim result is not available.

ellipsoidAxes · src/physics/reference/kinematics.ts · this site’s source, as built · sha256:af73d6f0e3a79dda8161fd4c40c41990f83d555f870f8cfaaf52746c4bb9fe45

This function computes the listed outputs when it runs.

In words

The three axes of a sphere as the frame it moves through measures it: the one along the motion is shortened by the square root of one minus beta squared, and the two across it are unchanged. At six tenths of the light speed a unit sphere measures 0.8 by 1 by 1. The paper's § 4 calls that an ellipsoid of revolution, and this function is the whole of that sentence.

Implementation

export function ellipsoidAxes(
  R: number,
  beta: number,
): KinematicResult<Readonly<{ longitudinal: number; transverseY: number; transverseZ: number }>> {
  const g = gamma(beta);
  if (g.status !== "value") return g;
  if (!finite(R) || R < 0)
    return outsideDomain("invalid-length", "Radius must be finite and nonnegative.");
  return ok({
    longitudinal: R * Math.sqrt(1 - beta * beta),
    transverseY: R,
    transverseZ: R,
  });
}

The physical context

§2: the relativity of simultaneity

In §2 of Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper, Einstein investigates a rigid rod of length rABr_{AB} moving with velocity vv relative to a stationary frame KK. Clocks mounted at the two ends AA and BB are synchronized by light signals emitted from AA at time tAt_A, reflected at BB at time tBt_B, and returning to AA at tA′t'_A.

From the perspective of stationary observers in KK, light travels forward with speed c−vc - v relative to the rod, and backward with speed c+vc + v:

tB−tA=rABc−v,tA′−tB=rABc+v\begin{gathered}t_B - t_A = \frac{r_{AB}}{c - v}, \\ t'_A - t_B = \frac{r_{AB}}{c + v}\end{gathered}

The two times differ, tB−tA≠tA′−tBt_B - t_A \neq t'_A - t_B. So observers riding with the rod, applying the test of §1, find the two clocks out of step, while observers at rest in KK declare them synchronous. Einstein draws the conclusion at the end of §2: simultaneity has no absolute meaning. Two events that are simultaneous as seen from one system of coordinates are not simultaneous as seen from a system moving relative to it.

§4: physical meaning of moving rods and spheres

In §4, Einstein uses the transformation he derived in §3 to find the dimensions of a moving body, measured at one time of the observer’s frame:

x′=γ(x−vt)=x−vt1−v2/c2x' = \gamma (x - v t) = \frac{x - v t}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}
Explain this equation

Taking positions of both ends at one time of the stationary frame (Δt=0\Delta t = 0) yields a measured coordinate length:

Δx=Δx′1−v2c2=L0γ\Delta x = \Delta x' \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}} = \frac{L_0}{\gamma}
Explain this equation

Similarly, a rigid sphere of radius RR at rest in kk, centred at its origin, has the surface ξ2+η2+ζ2=R2\xi^2 + \eta^2 + \zeta^2 = R^2. Measured at t=0t = 0 from the stationary system, it is an ellipsoid of revolution with semi-axes:

R1−v2c2,R,RR \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}, \qquad R, \qquad R
Explain this equation

Coordinate measurement versus visual appearance

Einstein’s length contraction describes coordinate measurement (positions recorded simultaneously in the measuring frame by a network of synchronized clocks). It is not what a human eye or camera sees. An optical image collects light rays that arrive at the shutter at the same instant, which left different parts of the moving object at different past times (Terrell-Penrose effect, 1959), causing a moving sphere to appear visually rotated rather than flattened.

Invariant spacetime intervals and causal order

This is a later way of stating the same facts, from Minkowski’s lecture of 1908 rather than the paper. Between any two events E1E_1 and E2E_2, the squared interval is the same in every inertial frame:

s2=Δx2+Δy2+Δz2−c2Δt2=Δx′2+Δy′2+Δz′2−c2Δt′2\begin{aligned}s^2 &= \Delta x^2 + \Delta y^2 + \Delta z^2 - c^2 \Delta t^2 \\ &= \Delta x'^2 + \Delta y'^2 + \Delta z'^2 - c^2 \Delta t'^2\end{aligned}
Explain this equation

When s2<0s^2 < 0 (timelike) or s2=0s^2 = 0 (lightlike), a subluminal or light signal can causally connect the events, and their chronological order is invariant across all inertial frames. When s2>0s^2 > 0 (spacelike), no signal can connect them, and observers in different states of relative motion disagree on which event occurred first.

Before you draw a conclusion

Common wrong turns this instrument speaks to

  • Einstein's β is the ratio v/c.

    In this paper β is the factor 1/1−(v/V)21/\sqrt{1-(v/V)^2}, the one modern texts write γ. At 0.6 of the speed of light it is 1.25, not 0.6.

    Read the full entry, with its sources

  • Length contraction is what a camera would see: a moving sphere would look flattened in a photograph.

    § 4's ellipsoid is the set of positions the surface occupies at one instant of the stationary system. A camera records light that arrives together, which left different parts of the body at different times. That is a different question, and the paper does not treat it.

    Read the full entry, with its sources

  • The paper's τ\tau is the proper time, the time a moving clock shows.

    τ\tau is the time coordinate of the moving system k: the time its synchronized clocks give to every point of k. It becomes the reading of one particular clock only at that clock's own place.

    Read the full entry, with its sources

Embed this laboratory on another page. It starts from its worked defaults, not your current settings.