Brownian motion · The statistical mechanics derivation
Why counting positions
gives the pressure law.
How can a vast microscopic problem, with every solvent molecule and every suspended particle in motion, yield a law as simple as Π = n k_B T without solving any molecular equations of motion?
Read the statistical argument and open its derivation steps →
BM-03 · Statistical mechanics derivation
The configuration integral laboratory
Predict before deriving
Doubling the volume available to two independent particles multiplies the number of position arrangements by 2, 4, or 8?
| Particle count | 2 |
|---|---|
| Volume expansion ratio V/V₀ | 2 |
| Position arrangement factor | 4 |
| Free-energy difference ΔF | -5.61085e-21 J |
| Ideal pressure p | 4.0473725e-9 Pa |
| Locked-cluster pressure | 2.0236863e-9 Pa |
| Volume-independent factor J | symbolic (cancels in derivative) |
| Momentum integrals | symbolic (cancels in derivative) |
| Free-energy offset F₀ | symbolic (cancels in derivative) |
Editorial commentary on Einstein §2
R0 (Overview): Counting where independent particles can be, not how they move, gives the pressure. Doubling the room doubles each particle's options.
R1 (Physical reasoning): Under independence, N_p particles explore volume V with a state-variable integral proportional to V^{N_p}. The free energy contains -k_B T ln(V^{N_p}) = -N_p k_B T ln V. Differentiating with respect to volume yields the pressure p = -dF/dV = N_p k_B T / V.
R2 (Mathematical structure): One particle has position options proportional to V. Two independent particles have options proportional to V * V = V^2. For N_p independent particles the factor is V^{N_p}. Taking the logarithm turns this product into the sum N_p ln V. The volume derivative removes the volume-independent factor J and the constant offset F_0, leaving p = N_p k_B T / V.
R3 (Historical notation & counterexample): Einstein's printed §2 notation uses B for the configuration integral, J for the volume-independent factor, lg for the natural logarithm, n for the particle count, V* for volume, and 2 kappa N = R for the gas constant relation. If the particles are locked into a single rigid cluster, the spatial arrangements grow only as V/V_0 rather than (V/V_0)^{N_p}, yielding pressure p = k_B T / V. Pressure counts independently placed units, not constituents.
What this model assumes
• Independence of particle positions (the §2 premise).
• Dilution (no excluded volume interactions).
• Uniform potential inside the accessible volume.
• Thermal equilibrium.
• The volume-independent factor J does not depend on volume V.
Not modeled: interactions between particles; excluded volume effects; external potential fields; non-ideal solutions; quantum statistics; momentum integrals beyond their cancellation in the derivative; molecular dynamics or collision trajectories; cluster formation or breakup kinetics.
Show the calculation owner and source identity
Configuration volume term, factor ratio and locked cluster pressure are computed by src/physics/reference/diffusion/routeA.ts.
Live terms bind particleCount, volume, temperature, and freeEnergy.
Compare two setups side by side in your reading. Each laboratory has its own settings, stepwise state and accepted results.
Open the derivation
From available volume to free energy
Einstein's §2 writes the free energy using the logarithm of an integral over all state variables (the configuration integral B). Under the premises of independent particle positions and dilution, the spatial positions of N_p particles contribute a clean volume factor V^{N_p}.
In modern notation, 2κN = R gives 2κ = k_B, the particle count n is written N_p, and the volume V* is V:
Why the complicated molecular factor J drops out
The factor J represents the integral over all solvent positions and interactions for fixed tracer coordinates. Under Einstein's three premises (homogeneous fluid, dilute independent particles, no external forces), shifting the particle positions does not change the probability of finding solvent molecules in any region. Thus J is independent of V, and differentiating with respect to volume leaves zero:
The locked-cluster counterexample: what is actually counted?
If the particles are rigidly locked together into a single cluster, the spatial arrangements grow only like V (or V/V_0) rather than (V/V_0)^{N_p}. The resulting osmotic pressure is that of one independent unit:
This demonstrates that osmotic pressure counts independently placed units, not constituents.