Annus Mirabilis · Interactive critical edition in preparation
Wave description and energy spreading
Treat light as a continuous wave and see what that picture explains.
An executable model
Wave description and energy spreading laboratory
Static worked example
CurrentThese numbers match the current settings.
Worked example: two waves of amplitude 1 and 1, 0° apart in phase: the centre of the screen has intensity 4, where one wave of amplitude 1 alone gives 1, and the fringes have visibility 1.
Brightness across the screen, ⟨I(y)⟩
Averaged over many cyclesTwo coherent point sources, added as waves. At the centre 4; fringe visibility 1; bright fringes 33.3 λ apart.
Wave crests from the two sources
d = 3.0 λ · δ = 0.00πCircles of crests spread from the coherent sources S₁ and S₂.
Values at these settings
Intensities are given in units of one wave of amplitude 1 on its own.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Intensity at the centre, averaged | 4 |
| Intensity at the centre, this instant | 8 |
| Intensity at the probe | 4 |
| Path difference at the probe | 0 λ |
| Fringe visibility (1 is full contrast) | 1 |
| Distance between bright fringes | 33.33 λ |
| Intensity across the screen | A curve of 101 points, drawn above |
Treat light as a continuous wave and two sources make bright and dark stripes, while the light of one source spreads ever thinner over larger and larger spheres. Einstein granted that this picture explains everything purely optical, and asked whether it could still fail where light is produced or absorbed.
The light paper opens by setting the wave theory beside the atomic picture of matter. In Maxwell's theory the energy of light is a continuous function of space: from a point source it spreads over an ever larger volume, while the energy of a body is a sum over a finite number of atoms and electrons. Einstein wrote that the wave theory, working with continuous functions of space, has proved itself excellently for purely optical phenomena and will probably never be replaced by another theory. He then added the caveat this instrument shows: optical observations concern averages over time, not instantaneous values. Two coherent unit waves in phase give an averaged intensity of 4 at the centre, in units of one wave's average, while at one instant the same point swings between 0 and 8 in every cycle; the bright fringes are 33.3 wavelengths apart on a screen 100 wavelengths from sources 3 wavelengths apart. One point source of 1 W spreads to 0.0796 W/m2 at 1 m, and the whole sphere around it always receives the full 1 W. His question was whether this continuous picture, confirmed for diffraction, reflection, refraction and dispersion, would still hold for the production and transformation of light.
Start with one wave. At a fixed point its field rises and falls as A cos(ωt), and its square, which carries the energy, goes as A2 cos2(ωt). Over a whole cycle cos2 averages to 1/2, so the average of the square is A2/2. The instrument measures intensity in units of that average for a wave of amplitude 1, so one unit wave reads 1 on average and 2 at its peak. Now two unit waves arrive in step at the centre of the screen. The fields add first: the total is 2 cos(ωt), and its square is 4 cos2(ωt). In the instrument's units that swings between 0 and 8 in every cycle and averages to 4, which is twice the 1 + 1 you would get by adding the two intensities; the extra 2 is the cross term 2A1A2 cos δ with the phase difference δ = 0. Shift one wave by half a cycle, δ = π, and the cross term is −2: the average is 0, a dark stripe. Along the screen the difference in path changes the phase, and the bright stripes repeat each time it grows by one wavelength. For sources d = 3 wavelengths apart and a screen L = 100 wavelengths away, the spacing is λL/d = 100/3 = 33.3 wavelengths. For the spreading, take a point source radiating P = 1 W equally in every direction. At distance r the power crosses a sphere of area 4πr2, so the intensity is P/(4πr2) = 1/(4π × 12) = 0.0796 W/m2 at 1 m, a quarter of that at 2 m, and the total over the sphere is 1 W at every radius. A window of 1 cm2, that is 10−4 m2, at 1 m receives about 0.0796 × 10−4 = 7.96 × 10−6 W; the exact figure for a flat disc differs by about 2 parts in 100 000. As r grows, the energy through any small window keeps falling without limit. The next paragraph of the paper replaces that continuous thinning with a hypothesis: a finite number of energy quanta, localized at points, which move without dividing and are absorbed or produced only as wholes.
The purely optical phenomena Einstein names are diffraction, reflection, refraction and dispersion. He kept the wave theory for them, writing that it would probably never be replaced, and confined his doubt to the production and transformation of light: black-body radiation, photoluminescence and the production of cathode rays by ultraviolet light. He called his own proposal a heuristic point of view, not a proof that light is not a wave. The two-source arrangement is Young's, from the first years of the nineteenth century; the field theory is Maxwell's of 1865, and Hertz produced its waves in 1888. The later dispute over whether single quanta interfere belongs to the history after 1905 and is not part of this paper.
What this model leaves out
It adds continuous scalar waves and spreads energy over spheres. It does not model:
- polarization, or the vector components of the electromagnetic field;
- photon statistics, antibunching, or any quantum optics;
- absorption, emission, or detection by matter;
- light that is not monochromatic, or that has a finite coherence length;
- diffraction beyond the idealised pair of coherent point sources;
- an absolute intensity scale, unless a power and a detector geometry are declared.
The explanation
Full explanation
Two sources make bright and dark stripes, and the light of one source spreads ever thinner over larger spheres. Einstein granted that the wave picture explains everything purely optical, and asked whether it could still fail where light is produced or absorbed.
Show every step of the investigation
Compare equal and unequal amplitudes and a phase shift, then follow the energy of one source out to larger distances. The wave picture keeps its successes here; the paper's question is about emission and absorption.
An explanatory model, not an observation of nature. This embed starts from the laboratory’s worked defaults, not a saved run. Presentation options change the surrounding guide, never the numerical inputs.