Annus Mirabilis · Interactive critical edition in preparation

Wave description and energy spreading

Treat light as a continuous wave and see what that picture explains.

An executable model

Wave description and energy spreading laboratory

Static worked example

CurrentThese numbers match the current settings.

What to look at

Predict before the numbers

Two equal waves meet at the centre of the screen. What happens to the intensity there when the phase difference goes from 0 to π?

Three relations the model could have

The result appears when you choose, say you have one in mind, or skip.

0.00π rad, 0°

What the detector records
Try
Experiment settings amplitudes, source spacing, probe position
Probe position on the screen

Worked example: two waves of amplitude 1 and 1, 0° apart in phase: the centre of the screen has intensity 4, where one wave of amplitude 1 alone gives 1, and the fringes have visibility 1.

Brightness across the screen, ⟨I(y)⟩

Averaged over many cycles

Two coherent point sources, added as waves. At the centre 4; fringe visibility 1; bright fringes 33.3 λ apart.

420y = 0, centrecentre: 4.00 (Δr = 0.00λ)Position on the screen, y

Wave crests from the two sources

d = 3.0 λ · δ = 0.00π

Circles of crests spread from the coherent sources S₁ and S₂.

S₁S₂ScreenI₀ = 4.0

Values at these settings

Intensities are given in units of one wave of amplitude 1 on its own.

QuantityValue
Intensity at the centre, averaged4
Intensity at the centre, this instant8
Intensity at the probe4
Path difference at the probe0 λ
Fringe visibility (1 is full contrast)1
Distance between bright fringes33.33 λ
Intensity across the screenA curve of 101 points, drawn above

Treat light as a continuous wave and two sources make bright and dark stripes, while the light of one source spreads ever thinner over larger and larger spheres. Einstein granted that this picture explains everything purely optical, and asked whether it could still fail where light is produced or absorbed.

The light paper opens by setting the wave theory beside the atomic picture of matter. In Maxwell's theory the energy of light is a continuous function of space: from a point source it spreads over an ever larger volume, while the energy of a body is a sum over a finite number of atoms and electrons. Einstein wrote that the wave theory, working with continuous functions of space, has proved itself excellently for purely optical phenomena and will probably never be replaced by another theory. He then added the caveat this instrument shows: optical observations concern averages over time, not instantaneous values. Two coherent unit waves in phase give an averaged intensity of 4 at the centre, in units of one wave's average, while at one instant the same point swings between 0 and 8 in every cycle; the bright fringes are 33.3 wavelengths apart on a screen 100 wavelengths from sources 3 wavelengths apart. One point source of 1 W spreads to 0.0796 W/m2 at 1 m, and the whole sphere around it always receives the full 1 W. His question was whether this continuous picture, confirmed for diffraction, reflection, refraction and dispersion, would still hold for the production and transformation of light.

What this model leaves out

It adds continuous scalar waves and spreads energy over spheres. It does not model:

  • polarization, or the vector components of the electromagnetic field;
  • photon statistics, antibunching, or any quantum optics;
  • absorption, emission, or detection by matter;
  • light that is not monochromatic, or that has a finite coherence length;
  • diffraction beyond the idealised pair of coherent point sources;
  • an absolute intensity scale, unless a power and a detector geometry are declared.

The explanation

Full explanation

Two sources make bright and dark stripes, and the light of one source spreads ever thinner over larger spheres. Einstein granted that the wave picture explains everything purely optical, and asked whether it could still fail where light is produced or absorbed.

Show every step of the investigation

Compare equal and unequal amplitudes and a phase shift, then follow the energy of one source out to larger distances. The wave picture keeps its successes here; the paper's question is about emission and absorption.

An explanatory model, not an observation of nature. This embed starts from the laboratory’s worked defaults, not a saved run. Presentation options change the surrounding guide, never the numerical inputs.