Annus Mirabilis · Interactive critical edition in preparation

Classical mode-energy allocation

Give every resonator the same mean energy, and see whether the radiation's total energy ever settles.

Classical mode-energy allocation

Classical mode-energy allocation

Static worked example
Experiment settings temperature, cutoff and probe frequencies

Worked example: with resonators up to 1 × 10¹⁴ Hz at 1500 K, the classical allocation holds 0.00644 J per cubic metre, and widening the cutoff tenfold multiplies it by 1000.

Mean energy per resonator oscillation2.070974 × 10−20 J
Energy with resonators up to the cutoff0.006439187 J/m³
Share of that energy above the probe frequency0.9990000
Energy after widening the cutoff tenfold6.439187 J/m³
Ratio: tenfold-widened energy ÷ current energy1000

With resonators up to 1.000 × 1014 Hz at 1500 K, the classical allocation holds 0.006439 J per cubic meter; each tenfold widening multiplies it by 1000. Every resonator oscillation carries the same mean energy kBT (source notation (R/N)T), which §1 notes is two-thirds of a free molecule's mean kinetic energy.

§2's Avogadro match and §4's later entropy argument (a separate instrument) use two disjoint limits of the same spectrum: the classical region, admitted at the 1% criterion for x ≤ 0.0198678, and the Wien region, admitted at x ≥ 4.60517. Meeting both arguments does not mean one "quantum regime" supplied both numbers.

The historical Avogadro readout, from Einstein's §2 constants
N, from Einstein's printed §2 constants (historical)6.170486 × 1023 mol⁻¹
N, as printed in §26.17 × 1023 mol⁻¹
NA, defined, 2019 SI (modern)6.02214076 × 1023 mol⁻¹
Hydrogen-atom mass from the printed N (historical)1.62 × 10−24 g
Hydrogen-atom mass, modern (labeled modern)1.673533 × 10−24 g

α is a suspected historical typographical correction (10⁻⁵⁷, not the witness's 10⁻⁵⁶); R = 8.31×10⁷ erg mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ and L = 3×10¹⁰ cm s⁻¹ are declared editorial inputs, not printed values, since §2 does not appear to print either. This readout is never mixed with a modern constant in the same number.

Not modeled: The mechanism coupling matter and radiation beyond Planck's stated equilibrium condition; Cavity shape and walls; The approach to equilibrium; Any quantum hypothesis; Measured spectra (a separate instrument shows those).

Show the calculation owner: which real functions computed these numbers

src/physics/reference/radiation/classical.ts (classicalCutoffEnergyDensity, classicalTotalEnergy, meanResonatorEnergy), src/physics/reference/radiation/avogadro.ts (avogadroFromPlanckConstants), src/physics/reference/radiation/spectra.ts (regimeRelativeErrors), and src/experiments/lq02/session.ts (composing the snapshot; this component never recomputes any of these).

Predict before the numbers

Widening the resonator range from 100 THz to 1000 THz changes the energy by how much?

Three relations the model could have

The result appears when you choose, say you have one in mind, or skip.

If every way a resonator can vibrate gets the same share of energy, the energy of the radiation grows without limit as higher and higher frequencies are allowed. Einstein notes that on this picture matter and light could never settle into a definite share of the energy.

Section 1 puts a gas, free electrons and resonators, electrons bound to fixed points, in a box with mirror walls. Collisions give each resonator's vibration along one line a mean energy Ē = (R/N)T, the same at every frequency; at 1500 K that is 2.07 × 10−20 J. Planck's relation between a resonator and the radiation around it, Ēν = (L3/8πν2)ρν, then fixes the density: ρν = (R/N)(8πν2/L3)T. The energy per unit volume up to a highest frequency νc is (8πkBT/3c3)νc3, which at 1500 K is 0.00644 J/m3 up to 1014 Hz, and 99.9 percent of it lies above 1013 Hz. Allow frequencies ten times higher and the energy grows a thousandfold, to 6.44 J/m3; allow them all and there is no finite total, which the instrument reports as a refusal rather than a number. Einstein concludes that the relation disagrees with experience and that on this picture there can be no definite distribution of energy between the ether and matter. Section 2 then shows that Planck's formula, which fits experience, agrees with this law at long wavelengths, and that matching the two gives N = 6.17 × 1023.

The explanation

Full explanation

Each resonator oscillation gets the mean energy (R/N)T whatever its frequency, so the energy up to a highest frequency grows as the cube of that frequency. Widen the range tenfold and the energy grows a thousandfold; remove the upper limit and the laboratory refuses the total, because on this model it has no finite value.

Show every step of the investigation

Set the temperature and the highest frequency, and read the energy up to it and the share lying above the probe frequency. Widen the range tenfold and compare the two energies, then remove the upper limit and read the refusal. The Avogadro readout repeats the calculation of §2 from the constants printed there.

An explanatory model, not an observation of nature. This embed starts from the laboratory’s worked defaults, not a saved run. Presentation options change the surrounding guide, never the numerical inputs.