Annus Mirabilis · Interactive critical edition in preparation

Photoelectric apparatus and stopping potential

Shine light on a metal and measure the fastest electrons it releases.

The photoelectric apparatus

Photoelectric apparatus laboratory

Static worked example

Model note
  • Incident radiant power (incidentPower), Frequency (frequency), Work function (workFunction), Quantum efficiency (quantumEfficiency) and Collector potential (collectorPotential): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in lq08.acceptedInputs.
  • Quantum energy (quantumEnergy): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.quantumEnergy.
  • Threshold frequency (thresholdFrequency): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.thresholdFrequency.
  • Maximum photoelectron kinetic energy (maxKineticEnergy): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.kMax.
  • Stopping potential magnitude (stoppingPotentialMagnitude): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.stoppingPotentialMagnitude.
  • Incident quantum rate (quantumRate): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.quantumRate.
  • Photoelectron emission rate (emissionRate): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.emissionRate.
  • Photocurrent (photocurrent): Host calculation, by the site's own reference code. Computed in photoelectric.photocurrent.
  • Computed from the settings last applied (settings revision 1, result 1).
  • Not modeled: Real-material electron energy distributions and yields; Contact potentials and surface states; Space charge; Reflection losses; Emission angles; Multi-photon or thermionic emission; The timing of individual emissions; Energy transfer models beyond the declared complete or partial cases; Any claim that the moving marks depict photons.

Predict before the numbers

Make the lamp twice as bright without changing its frequency. What happens to the energy of the fastest electrons?

Three relations the model could have

Predict before the numbers

Raise the frequency while keeping the lamp's power the same. What happens to the number of quanta arriving each second?

Three relations the model could have

Predict before the numbers

Two different metals are lit by the same lamp. Plotted against frequency, are their stopping-potential lines parallel, crossing, or identical?

Three relations the model could have

The result appears when you choose, say you have one in mind, or skip.

600.0 THz: one quantum carries hν = 2.48 eV

1.00 mW

2.515 × 1015 quanta arrive each second.

Try
Experiment settings work function, quantum efficiency, collector potential, Millikan’s 1916 data

2.20 eV, a hypothetical metal unless a preset names one

Worked example: a quantum of 600 THz light carries 2.48 eV, more than the 2.2 eV work function, so the fastest electrons leave with 0.28 eV and a stopping potential of 0.28 V holds them back.

Where one quantum’s energy goes

hν = 2.481 eV, Φ = 2.20 eV , threshold ν0 = 532.0 THz

0 eVoutside the metal−2.20 eV−Φ, an electron in the metal+hν = 2.48 eVKmax = 0.281 eV

Stopping potential against frequency

In the model the slope is h/e = 4.136 × 10−15 V·s for every metal.

40060080010001200Frequency ν (THz)0.01.02.03.0Stopping potential (V)ν₀ = 532.0 THz

Millikan, 1916: sodium, on his own scale

Later evidence, published 1916. Not on the 1904 shelf.

His Fig. 6 plots, for each mercury line, the potential on the sodium at which its photocurrent stops, before the contact potential between sodium and collector is taken out. So the points sit on his scale, not the model's, and what compares is the slope.

−2−10+160080010001200Frequency (THz)Volts

Line through the 5 points he says fixed the slope (filled): 4.07 × 10−15 V·s ± 8.6 × 10−17, fitted here to his points as read from the figure.

Slope from Fig. 6, as printed: 4.124 × 10−15 V·s

Slope with Table II's nine determinations, as printed: 4.128 × 10−15 V·s

h/e from this laboratory's constants: 4.1357 × 10−15 V·s

His points
Frequency (THz)Potential (V)Fixed the slope
547.4−2.05yes
692.5−1.492yes
741.2−1.3yes
821.2−0.919yes
961.4−0.38yes
1182+0.52no

R. A. Millikan, A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's "h", Physical Review (2), 7 (3), 355–388 (1916). Fig. 6.

Current against collector potential

Saturation current Isat = 40.30 μA

-3-2-10+1+2+3Collector potential (V)Current I (μA)−Vs​ = −0.28 V

Values at these settings

QuantityValue
Energy of one quantum, hν2.481 eV
Threshold frequency, Φ/h532 THz
Largest electron energy, hν − Φ0.2814 eV
Stopping potential0.2814 V
Quanta arriving each second2.515 × 1015 per second
Electrons freed each second2.515 × 1014 per second
Current at this collector potential40.3 μA

Light shining on a metal knocks electrons out of it. In this model, brighter light releases more of them each second but none faster, while light of a higher frequency makes the fastest ones faster, as Einstein expected if light gives up its energy in separate quanta.

Section 8 applies the light quantum to cathode rays produced by light. In the simplest picture, which Einstein says he will assume, one quantum gives its whole energy hν to one electron; the electron spends a work Φ, characteristic of the body, in leaving it, so the fastest electrons come out with kinetic energy hν − Φ. A body charged positive just enough to keep them all in, to the potential Vs, satisfies eVs = hν − Φ. Two consequences follow. Plotted against ν, Vs is a straight line whose slope, h/e, does not depend on the substance. And if each quantum acts independently of the rest, the intensity of the light changes how many electrons leave each second, not how fast they go. The defaults, 600 THz light at 1 mW on a hypothetical surface with Φ = 2.2 eV, give quanta of 2.48 eV, a threshold at 532 THz and a stopping potential of 0.281 V; with one quantum in ten releasing an electron, 2.52 × 1014 electrons leave each second, a current of 40.3 μA. Doubling the power doubles the current and leaves 0.281 V unchanged.

Modern qualifications

Einstein wrote the quantum's energy as (R/N)βν, with R the gas constant, N the number of molecules in a gram-molecule and β the constant in Wien's exponent, so (R/N)β is Planck's h. He wrote Π for the potential, ε for the electron's charge and P for the work, and also gave the law per gram-equivalent of charge, ΠE = Rβν − P′. He called complete transfer to one electron the simplest picture, and allowed that an electron might take up only part of a quantum, in which case ΠE + P′ ≤ Rβν. In 1905 the prediction was untested: Lenard had reported in 1902 that the electrons' speed does not depend on the intensity of the light, but nobody had yet measured the straight line Einstein predicted. Millikan did so in 1916, finding a slope that gave Planck's h to within about half a percent, while calling the theory by which Einstein had reached the equation untenable. The word photon is Lewis's, from 1926.

Show the code

The site’s own reference code for this law, in TypeScript. It computes the numbers above when the page runs it, and it is what the page uses wherever a FrankenSim result is not available.

stoppingPotentialMagnitude · src/physics/reference/photoelectric.ts · this site’s source, as built · sha256:d3b770e4a65e0a36833d8dd82384f33a3b6e6909190c9b094ceca3043aafc29a

This function computes the listed outputs when it runs.

In words

V_s = K_max / e = (h nu - Phi) / e. The physics is in kMax, which this calls; what this function does is ask for the maximum kinetic energy in joules and divide by the elementary charge to put it in volts. Measured at 10^15 Hz against a 2.0 eV work function: 2.135667696923859 V.

Implementation

/**
 * Stopping potential magnitude: V_s = K_max / e = (h * nu - Phi) / e (in Volts).
 *
 * Epistemic rule:
 * When nu < nu_0, stopping potential is `not-applicable` with reason
 * "no emitted electron in this model".
 * Under partial transfer, returns `underdetermined` with upperBound = (h * nu - Phi) / e.
 */
export function stoppingPotentialMagnitude(
  nu: number,
  workFunctionJoules: number,
  set?: ConstantSet,
  transferModelOrOptions:
    | EnergyTransferMode
    | Readonly<{ transferModel?: EnergyTransferMode }> = "complete",
): PhotoelectricResult<number> {
  const transferModel: EnergyTransferMode =
    typeof transferModelOrOptions === "object" && transferModelOrOptions !== null
      ? (transferModelOrOptions.transferModel ?? "complete")
      : transferModelOrOptions;
  const kResult = kMax(nu, workFunctionJoules, set, transferModel);
  if (kResult.status === "underdetermined") {
    const e = getElementaryCharge(set);
    const extra: {
      upperBound?: number;
      unit?: string;
      citation?: string;
      reason?: string;
      bounds?: readonly [number, number];
      quantityId?: string;
    } = {
      unit: "V",
      quantityId: "stoppingPotentialMagnitude",
    };
    if (kResult.upperBound !== undefined) extra.upperBound = kResult.upperBound / e;
    if (kResult.citation !== undefined) extra.citation = kResult.citation;
    if (kResult.reason !== undefined) extra.reason = kResult.reason;
    if (kResult.bounds !== undefined) extra.bounds = [kResult.bounds[0] / e, kResult.bounds[1] / e];
    return underdetermined(kResult.compatibleFamily, kResult.neededInformation, extra);
  }
  if (kResult.status !== "value") return kResult;
  const e = getElementaryCharge(set);
  return ok(kResult.value / e, "V", {
    ...(kResult.note ? { note: kResult.note } : {}),
    quantityId: "stoppingPotentialMagnitude",
  });
}

Einstein’s 1905 §8 check, by order of magnitude

What was neglected: Einstein sets P' = 0 as a deliberate neglect of escape work for order-of-magnitude comparison against Lenard's spark-potential observations, not as a physical prediction for a named metal.

What it is not: This is not a prediction for any named metal; any real substance has P' > 0, so its stopping potential at this frequency is lower by exactly the amount the work function contributes.

As printed: Π = Rβν / E = 4.34 V, “ca. 4,3 Volt”. Slope 4.212 × 10−15 V·s, against a modern h/e of 4.136 × 10−15 V·s.

At these settings: ν = 600.0 THz gives hν = 2.481 eV; with the hypothetical Φ = 2.20 eV the stopping potential is 0.281 V.

What this model leaves out

It follows Einstein’s 1905 rule that one absorbed quantum gives its energy to one electron, which spends Φ escaping. It does not model:

  • Real-material electron energy distributions and yields
  • Contact potentials and surface states
  • Space charge
  • Reflection losses
  • Emission angles
  • Multi-photon or thermionic emission
  • The timing of individual emissions
  • Energy transfer models beyond the declared complete or partial cases
  • Any claim that the moving marks depict photons

The explanation

Full explanation

In this model brighter light releases more electrons each second but none faster, while light of a higher frequency makes the fastest ones faster. The stopping potential rises in a straight line with the frequency, as Einstein expected if light gives up its energy in separate quanta.

Show every step of the investigation

Change the intensity and then the frequency, and compare what each does to the current and to the stopping potential. Below the threshold frequency no electron is emitted, and the stopping potential is reported as not applicable rather than zero.

An explanatory model, not an observation of nature. This embed starts from the laboratory’s worked defaults, not a saved run. Presentation options change the surrounding guide, never the numerical inputs.