Read · Special relativity: from clock operations to electrodynamics
§10 · electron force, work, and closing scope
Follow the introduction and all ten sections, including field transformations, finite light complexes, moving mirrors, charge-current transformations, and the electron-force conventions.
Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.
A force-to-acceleration ratio needs two frame labels
Why are there two transverse coefficients?
The printed transverse coefficient compares comoving force with laboratory acceleration and equals mγ². Using laboratory force with laboratory acceleration instead gives mγ. These are different definitions, not two conflicting values of invariant mass.
axFx=mγ3,ayFy′=mγ2,ayFy=mγ
Longitudinal laboratory force over acceleration gives m gamma cubed; comoving transverse force over laboratory acceleration gives m gamma squared; laboratory transverse force gives m gamma.
For motion along x, the transverse force in the momentarily comoving frame differs from the laboratory transverse force by γ. Combining it with laboratory acceleration gives the source’s coefficient. Replacing that force with laboratory force changes the ratio.
At 0.6c, γ = 1.25. The longitudinal coefficient is 1.953125m, the printed transverse coefficient is 1.5625m, and the laboratory transverse coefficient is 1.25m. SR-13 displays the frame convention with the coefficient, rather than “repairing” the printed result.
Choose motion along the x axis and distinguish longitudinal from transverse components.
Label the frame of the force and acceleration separately.
Use the instantaneous comoving-frame force law.
Transform acceleration and force consistently.
Form the source’s mixed-frame transverse ratio and the separate laboratory ratio.
Keep invariant mass m distinct from either direction-dependent coefficient.
Show every step here: A force-to-acceleration ratio needs two frame labels
Choose motion along the x axis and distinguish longitudinal from transverse components.
Label the frame of the force and acceleration separately.
Use the instantaneous comoving-frame force law.
Transform acceleration and force consistently.
Form the source’s mixed-frame transverse ratio and the separate laboratory ratio.
Keep invariant mass m distinct from either direction-dependent coefficient.
The printed transverse coefficient compares comoving force with laboratory acceleration and equals mγ². Using laboratory force with laboratory acceleration instead gives mγ. These are different definitions, not two conflicting values of invariant mass.
What this relies on
Start with the electron’s instantaneous rest-frame force law.
Specify the frame of each force and acceleration component.
The reviewed German, aligned English, gloss, facsimile, and split view for this passage are not yet available. The explanation does not stand in for those source layers.
Assumptions and limits: A force-to-acceleration ratio needs two frame labels
Assumed here
Start with the electron’s instantaneous rest-frame force law.
Specify the frame of each force and acceleration component.
What this does not establish
The historical coefficients are not a claim that invariant rest mass changes with observer speed.
The ideal slowly accelerated point-particle treatment omits radiation reaction and self-field dynamics.
What energy is required to accelerate an electron?
Integrating the longitudinal force gives kinetic energy mc²(γ − 1), not the total rest energy. Accelerating voltage and curvature provide separate experimental relations under specified fields.
K=∫0vmγ(u)3udu=mc2(γ−1)
Integrating the longitudinal work from rest gives m c squared times gamma minus one.
Use dγ/du = γ³u/c² to evaluate the integral. Near zero speed, K approaches mv²/2. At 0.6c the exact value is 0.25mc² whereas the quadratic approximation is 0.18mc², so the approximation error is visible.
∣q∣U=K,rB=∣q∣Bγmv
For acceleration from rest, charge magnitude times voltage magnitude supplies kinetic energy; in a transverse magnetic field the circular radius is gamma m v over charge magnitude B.
The third relation compares electric and magnetic deflection, with force and acceleration conventions kept explicit. In a purely transverse electric field the instantaneous curvature radius is γmv²/(|q|E). SR-13 separates that local curvature from a magnetic circular orbit at constant speed.
Write longitudinal force as mγ³ times acceleration.
Multiply by displacement, using a dx = u du.
Integrate from rest and use the derivative of gamma.
Compare the exact value with the low-speed expansion without calling them equal at 0.6c.
For a voltage estimate, use charge magnitude and state the energy-loss assumption.
For deflection, distinguish magnetic constant-speed curvature from an instantaneous transverse electric curvature.
Show every step here: The work integral has an observable endpoint
Write longitudinal force as mγ³ times acceleration.
Multiply by displacement, using a dx = u du.
Integrate from rest and use the derivative of gamma.
Compare the exact value with the low-speed expansion without calling them equal at 0.6c.
For a voltage estimate, use charge magnitude and state the energy-loss assumption.
For deflection, distinguish magnetic constant-speed curvature from an instantaneous transverse electric curvature.
Integrating the longitudinal force gives kinetic energy mc²(γ − 1), not the total rest energy. Accelerating voltage and curvature provide separate experimental relations under specified fields.
What this relies on
Use invariant mass m, subluminal speed, and the stated force convention.
For the voltage relation, the particle begins at rest and field work becomes kinetic energy.
The reviewed German, aligned English, gloss, facsimile, and split view for this passage are not yet available. The explanation does not stand in for those source layers.
Assumptions and limits: The work integral has an observable endpoint
Assumed here
Use invariant mass m, subluminal speed, and the stated force convention.
For the voltage relation, the particle begins at rest and field work becomes kinetic energy.
What this does not establish
The ideal treatment excludes radiation loss and material interactions.
A kinetic-energy expression alone does not derive the September statement about changing rest energy.
Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.
A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?. Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s reviewed translation or pinned facsimile.
16 foundation readings sit behind this argument.
Keep the explanation for offline reading
Each HTML file contains the available explanation at every detail level, linked foundations, source references, and available build-time scalar results. It includes no private notes or running simulations. This remains an explanation preview, not a reviewed source edition.
Open the downloaded file in a browser. Online source links still need a connection. Interactive plots are not included. Browse saved-chapter downloads.