Read · Special relativity: from clock operations to electrodynamics

§5 · velocity composition

Follow the introduction and all ten sections, including field transformations, finite light complexes, moving mirrors, charge-current transformations, and the electron-force conventions.

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

Read the whole available argument →

Show me one example before the notation →

§5 · velocity composition

derivation · Within the stated model

The denominator changes as well

Why do two ordinary-looking speeds not simply add?

ux=uxv1vux/c2,uy=uyγ(1vux/c2)u_x'=\frac{u_x-v}{1-vu_x/c^2},\qquad u_y'=\frac{u_y}{\gamma(1-vu_x/c^2)}

The transformed longitudinal velocity is u x minus v over one minus v u x over c squared; transverse velocity has the same denominator and an additional gamma.

To describe an object moving at w along the moving frame’s positive axis in the original frame, use the inverse relation U = (v + w)/(1 + vw/c²). With v = w = 0.6c, U is 15c/17, about 0.88235c, not 1.2c.

For a right-moving light ray u_x = c, the passive transformation also gives c. SR-06 shows the difference from Galilean addition without clamping a superluminal arithmetic result.

Show every step here: The denominator changes as well
  1. Differentiate x′ = γ(x − vt) along the trajectory.
  2. Differentiate t′ = γ(t − vx/c²) along that same trajectory.
  3. Divide dx′ by dt′ only after both have been transformed.
  4. For transverse motion use dy′ = dy but retain the transformed time denominator.
  5. Use the inverse relation for the plus-sign composition of two forward speeds.
  6. Distinguish aligned composition from the general non-collinear case.
Assumptions and limits: The denominator changes as well

Assumed here

  • Use the same two neighboring events on a particle’s trajectory.
  • Frames are inertial and the boost is along x.

What this does not establish

  • The plus-sign composition formula and a passive frame change have different stated directions.
  • Non-collinear boosts generally include a rotation, not only another aligned boost.

Earlier step: Light constraints leave a scale to determine

Source context: German source · English · Interlinear gloss · Facsimile

References and source status

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

A. Einstein, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 891–921 (1905).

A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?. Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s reviewed translation or pinned facsimile.

16 foundation readings sit behind this argument.

Keep the explanation for offline reading

Each HTML file contains the available explanation at every detail level, linked foundations, source references, and available build-time scalar results. It includes no private notes or running simulations. This remains an explanation preview, not a reviewed source edition.

Open the downloaded file in a browser. Online source links still need a connection. Interactive plots are not included. Browse saved-chapter downloads.