Read · Special relativity: from clock operations to electrodynamics

Introduction · magnet, conductor, and the postulates

Follow the introduction and all ten sections, including field transformations, finite light complexes, moving mirrors, charge-current transformations, and the electron-force conventions.

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

Read the whole available argument →

Show me one example before the notation →

Introduction · magnet, conductor, and the postulates

assumption · Within the stated model

One apparatus, two descriptions

Why should changing the observer change the explanation?

In one description, charges move through a magnetic field. In another, the conductor is at rest and an electric field drives them. The apparent explanatory asymmetry motivates the paper; it is not resolved by declaring that electric and magnetic fields have the same values for every observer.

The two postulates state that the laws have the same form in inertial frames and that light propagates in vacuum at a definite speed independent of the source motion. They are the starting point, not consequences of failed ether-drift experiments alone.

SR-02 compares the descriptions under explicit transformations. At finite relative speed, forces and electromotive quantities must be compared through their transformation laws. The familiar equal-value argument is only a low-speed approximation.

Show every step here: One apparatus, two descriptions
  1. Identify the conductor, magnet, charges, and the observer.
  2. Describe the same interaction in the other inertial frame.
  3. Record which quantities change under that change of description.
  4. State the two postulates before using them.
  5. Return to §6 to see electric and magnetic components transform together.
Assumptions and limits: One apparatus, two descriptions

Assumed here

  • Compare inertial descriptions of the same apparatus and events.
  • The relativity principle and light-speed postulate are stated physical assumptions.

What this does not establish

  • A simulator cannot prove its own postulates.
  • The restricted dipole-and-conductor model does not cover every induction experiment.

Source context: German source · English · Interlinear gloss · Facsimile

References and source status

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

A. Einstein, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 891–921 (1905).

A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?. Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s reviewed translation or pinned facsimile.

16 foundation readings sit behind this argument.

Keep the explanation for offline reading

Each HTML file contains the available explanation at every detail level, linked foundations, source references, and available build-time scalar results. It includes no private notes or running simulations. This remains an explanation preview, not a reviewed source edition.

Open the downloaded file in a browser. Online source links still need a connection. Interactive plots are not included. Browse saved-chapter downloads.