Read · Special relativity: from clock operations to electrodynamics
§6 · field equations and field components
Follow the introduction and all ten sections, including field transformations, finite light complexes, moving mirrors, charge-current transformations, and the electron-force conventions.
Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.
The chain rule mixes time and longitudinal derivatives. Grouping the resulting terms suggests transformed electric and magnetic components; covariance alone is not a uniqueness proof of their physical identification.
∂t=γ(∂t′−v∂x′),∂x=γ(∂x′−v∂t′/c2)
The chain rule mixes the time and x derivatives, with gamma and the appropriate powers of light speed.
For a plane wave traveling along x with E_y and B_z, the SI vacuum pair is ∂t E_y = −c² ∂x B_z and ∂t B_z = −∂x E_y. Substitute the two derivative operators above into both equations; do not transform only one equation.
Combining those substituted equations groups E_y − vB_z with B_z − vE_y/c². Multiplication by the common γ produces E′_y and B′_z and restores the corresponding primed equation pair. SR-07 opens the grouping step rather than treating the field law as a typographic replacement.
The source permits a common factor for all transformed fields. Inversion requires its value at v times its value at −v to be one. Spatial symmetry and the positive identity-connected normalization select one.
Apply the chain rule to time and x derivatives of the same field.
Substitute into both members of the coupled plane-wave equation pair.
Group the electric/magnetic combinations, retaining every factor of c.
Check the inverse and spatial symmetry before fixing the common normalization.
Keep physical field identification separate from the algebraic fact that the equations keep their form.
Show every step here: Transform derivatives before naming fields
Name the coordinate map and its inverse.
Apply the chain rule to time and x derivatives of the same field.
Substitute into both members of the coupled plane-wave equation pair.
Group the electric/magnetic combinations, retaining every factor of c.
Check the inverse and spatial symmetry before fixing the common normalization.
Keep physical field identification separate from the algebraic fact that the equations keep their form.
The chain rule mixes time and longitudinal derivatives. Grouping the resulting terms suggests transformed electric and magnetic components; covariance alone is not a uniqueness proof of their physical identification.
What this relies on
Use the Lorentz coordinate map and vacuum Maxwell equations.
The example is expressed in SI with explicit factors of c.
The reviewed German, aligned English, gloss, facsimile, and split view for this passage are not yet available. The explanation does not stand in for those source layers.
Assumptions and limits: Transform derivatives before naming fields
Assumed here
Use the Lorentz coordinate map and vacuum Maxwell equations.
The example is expressed in SI with explicit factors of c.
What this does not establish
SI factors cannot be obtained by merely renaming the source’s Gaussian field symbols.
A common field scale needs a normalization argument in addition to rearranging equations.
For a boost along x, longitudinal field components stay unchanged and transverse electric and magnetic components mix. Transforming the force consistently does not require equal raw force values in both frames.
The x components stay unchanged; the transverse electric and magnetic components mix with the stated signs and SI factors.
For E = 0 and a positive B_z, an observer moving along positive x measures a negative E′_y. At v = 0.6c the factor γ is 1.25. The transformed electric field is not simply the old field copied into a different diagram.
SR-08 and SR-02 retain the charge and apparatus assumptions. In the charge’s instantaneous rest frame the local force is electric; relating it to the original frame also requires the force transformation, not an assertion of numerical equality.
Fix the direction of the boost and the field unit convention.
Leave E_x and B_x unchanged for this aligned boost.
Mix E_y with B_z and E_z with B_y using the cross-product signs.
Transform magnetic components with the corresponding v/c² electric terms.
Transform the particle’s velocity before comparing force descriptions.
Use the inverse field transformation to recover the original components.
Show every step here: Electric and magnetic components mix together
Fix the direction of the boost and the field unit convention.
Leave E_x and B_x unchanged for this aligned boost.
Mix E_y with B_z and E_z with B_y using the cross-product signs.
Transform magnetic components with the corresponding v/c² electric terms.
Transform the particle’s velocity before comparing force descriptions.
Use the inverse field transformation to recover the original components.
For a boost along x, longitudinal field components stay unchanged and transverse electric and magnetic components mix. Transforming the force consistently does not require equal raw force values in both frames.
What this relies on
Use vacuum SI fields and a boost of speed v along positive x.
Compare forces at corresponding events with transformed particle velocity.
The reviewed German, aligned English, gloss, facsimile, and split view for this passage are not yet available. The explanation does not stand in for those source layers.
Assumptions and limits: Electric and magnetic components mix together
Assumed here
Use vacuum SI fields and a boost of speed v along positive x.
Compare forces at corresponding events with transformed particle velocity.
What this does not establish
A charge’s momentary rest frame is not one global frame for an accelerated path.
Fields, forces, and electromotive quantities need their own transformation laws.
Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.
A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?. Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s reviewed translation or pinned facsimile.
16 foundation readings sit behind this argument.
Keep the explanation for offline reading
Each HTML file contains the available explanation at every detail level, linked foundations, source references, and available build-time scalar results. It includes no private notes or running simulations. This remains an explanation preview, not a reviewed source edition.
Open the downloaded file in a browser. Online source links still need a connection. Interactive plots are not included. Browse saved-chapter downloads.