light quanta
The equation explained
In wordsThe radiation's energy per unit volume and unit frequency, added up over every frequency from zero upward, equals the gas constant over the number of molecules in a gram-equivalent, times eight π over the speed of light cubed, times the temperature, times the frequency squared added up over every frequency; and that is infinite.OverviewAdd up the density over all frequencies and the radiation's total energy comes out infinite: the wider the range of resonator frequencies, the more energy the space holds, without limit. On this picture ether and matter can never settle into a definite share of the energy.Full explanationThis is the paper's second objection to the equilibrium density. The radiation's energy per unit volume is the density added up over all frequencies. With the density of the preceding line, everything except is the same at every frequency and comes out in front, leaving . Up to any highest frequency that integral is a third of the highest frequency cubed, so it grows without bound as the range widens: allowing frequencies ten times higher multiplies the energy a thousandfold. Over all frequencies the total is infinite. The paper concludes that in this picture 'there can be no question of a definite distribution of energy between ether and matter'.Every step is the energy per unit volume between and . Adding these pieces over every frequency gives the radiation's whole energy per unit volume.Put in the density that the equilibrium condition gave (the preceding display)., , and are the same at every frequency, so they come out of the integral; only stays inside.Up to a highest frequency , the integral of the frequency squared is a third of , since grows by over each small range. It grows without limit as the highest frequency is raised.With no highest frequency the integral has no finite value, so neither has the energy: the printed conclusion.Historian's marginEinstein gives this divergence no name. The name it later carried in textbooks, the 'ultraviolet catastrophe', is Ehrenfest's, from 1911 (P. Ehrenfest, Annalen der Physik 36, 91-118). The paper's own words are that the relation lacks agreement with experience and allows no definite distribution of energy between ether and matter.Also