Read · Brownian motion: from wandering to a measurable law · Results

Introduction · A motion the theory requires

Particles just large enough to see under a microscope must wander, Einstein argues, and how far they wander in a given time would let us count molecules. Read the argument, and open any step it leaves out.

Draft explanation, not yet reviewed

This is newly written explanation in modern notation, and its editorial review is pending. It is not the German source, an English translation, or a complete edition of the paper. The German source face holds a machine-drafted transcription with hand correction that no one has reviewed yet, and the facsimile face shows the pinned journal pages; an English translation is not ready. The headings name the part of the argument each passage discusses; they are not a list of the paper’s paragraphs.

Introduction · A motion the theory requires

What the paper sets out to show, and what would decide it

On the molecular-kinetic theory of heat, bodies just large enough to see in a microscope must move by amounts a microscope can detect. Einstein thinks this may be the Brownian motion, but says the reports he could obtain were too imprecise for him to judge. Observing the motion and its laws would mean classical thermodynamics is not exactly valid for spaces a microscope can resolve and would allow the size of atoms to be determined; a failed prediction would weigh heavily against the molecular view.