Translation

On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Generation and Transformation of Light

Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt

by A. Einstein

§ 7. On Stokes’s rule.

Let monochromatic light be transformed by photoluminescence into light of a different frequency, and, in accordance with the result just obtained, let it be assumed that both the generating and the generated light consist of energy quanta of magnitude (R/N)βν(R/N) \beta \nu, where ν\nu denotes the frequency in question. The transformation process is then to be interpreted as follows. Each generating energy quantum of frequency ν1\nu_1 is absorbed and — at least when the distribution density of the generating energy quanta is sufficiently small — by itself alone gives rise to the production of a light quantum of frequency ν2\nu_2; possibly, in the absorption of the generating light quantum, light quanta of frequencies ν3\nu_3, ν4\nu_4, etc., as well as energy of other kinds (e.g., heat) may also arise at the same time. Through what intermediate processes this final result comes about is immaterial. If the photoluminescent substance is not to be regarded as a permanent source of energy, then by the energy principle the energy of a generated energy quantum cannot be greater than that of a generating light quantum; the following relation must therefore hold: RNβν2≦RNβν1\frac{R}{N} \beta \nu_2 \leqq \frac{R}{N} \beta \nu_1Gas constantAvogadro's numberSpectral constant BFrequency of the emitted lightFrequency of the absorbed lightExplain this equation or ν2≦ν1.\nu_2 \leqq \nu_1 .Frequency of the emitted lightFrequency of the absorbed lightExplain this equation This is Stokes’s well-known rule.

It is especially to be emphasized that with weak illumination, other circumstances being equal, the quantity of light generated must according to our conception be proportional to the intensity of the exciting light, since each exciting energy quantum will cause an elementary process of the kind indicated above, independently of the action of the other exciting energy quanta. In particular, there will be no lower limit for the intensity of the exciting light below which the light would be incapable of exciting light.

According to the conception of the phenomena set forth here, deviations from Stokes’s rule are conceivable in the following cases:
1. when the number of energy quanta per unit volume simultaneously undergoing transformation is so large that an energy quantum of the generated light can receive its energy from several generating energy quanta;
2. when the generating (or generated) light does not have the energetic character belonging to a “black radiation” within the range of validity of Wien’s law, that is, when, e.g., the exciting light is produced by a body of so high a temperature that Wien’s law no longer holds for the wavelength in question.

The last-mentioned possibility deserves particular interest. For according to the conception developed here it is not ruled out that a “non-Wien radiation”, even at great dilution, behaves energetically differently from a “black radiation” within the range of validity of Wien’s law.

Bern, 17 March 1905.

(Received 18 March 1905.)