Read · Light quanta: from entropy to an energy scale

§9 · ionization bounds and closing scope

Read this section in the whole paper →

Show me one example before the notation →

§9 · ionization bounds and closing scope

A derivation

A threshold does not specify a yield

What can energy conservation say about gas ionization?

The 4 printed paragraphs this passage explains
  • §9, paragraph 1: When ultraviolet light ionizes a gas, each absorbed quantum should ionize one molecule, so the work to ionize a molecule cannot exceed the energy of one quantum. Lenard's longest effective wavelength for air, about 1.9 × 10⁻⁵ cm, gives an upper limit of 6.4 × 10¹² erg per gram-equivalent.
  • §9, paragraph 2: Stark's smallest measured ionizing voltage for air, about 10 volts, gives a nearly equal upper limit of 9.6 × 10¹². A further consequence, worth testing: the number of gram-molecules ionized should equal the absorbed light energy divided by Rβν, for any gas with no noticeable absorption at that frequency that is not accompanied by ionization.
  • §9, footnote 1: The footnote cites Stark, Die Elektrizität in Gasen, page 57, Leipzig 1902.
  • §9, footnote 2: The footnote notes that inside the gas the ionizing voltage for negative ions is five times larger.

Let II be the required energy for the specified ionization channel. A single quantum can pay this cost only when hνh\nu is at least II. A smaller quantum leaves an energy deficit; a larger quantum makes the event energetically possible, not certain.

h ν≥Ih\,\nu \ge I

One-quantum ionization requires quantum energy at least equal to the specified ionization energy.

For monochromatic absorbed energy EabsE_\text{abs}, the number of absorbed quanta is represented by Eabs/(hν)E_\text{abs}/(h\nu). With at most one counted ionization per quantum this gives an upper bound. It becomes an equality only when all absorbed quanta each produce one counted ionization.

nions≤Lh νn_{\mathrm{ions}} \le \frac{L}{h\,\nu}

The ionization count is at most absorbed energy divided by quantum energy, under the at-most-one-ionization assumption.

The paper compares two upper limits for the work of ionizing a gram-equivalent of air. Lenard's longest ionizing wavelength gives 6.4×10126.4\times10^{12} erg, and Stark's smallest measured ionizing voltage, about 10 volts at platinum anodes, gives 9.6×10129.6\times10^{12}, nearly the same. A footnote concedes that inside the gas the ionizing voltage for negative ions is five times larger. Each measured voltage caps the work, so the smallest gives the tightest cap; the fivefold figure caps it only at about 4.8×10134.8\times10^{13} erg, and the near agreement the paper notes holds for the smallest value.

The ionization laboratory separates incident energy, absorbed fraction, threshold, and conversion assumptions. Its historical checks use their own stated units; this explanation does not infer a new gas species or a real-material yield from a threshold slider.

Show every step here: A threshold does not specify a yield

Letters: the paper writes J for the work needed to ionize one gram-equivalent, L for the amount of light absorbed (not the speed of light here), and j for the number of gram-molecules ionized. This explanation works per molecule: I is the energy needed to ionize one molecule, hν is one quantum, EabsE_{\mathrm{abs}} is the absorbed energy, and nionsn_{\mathrm{ions}} is the count of ions.

  1. The assumption: when a gas is ionized by ultraviolet light, each absorbed quantum is used to ionize one gas molecule.
  2. A single quantum can pay the cost of ionization only if it carries at least that much energy. Per molecule, that is the formula below.
h ν≥Ih\,\nu \ge I

One-quantum ionization requires quantum energy at least equal to the specified ionization energy.

  1. The paper's form, for one gram-equivalent: multiply both sides by N, and the condition reads Rβν at least J.
  2. Worked with the paper's inputs. Lenard's longest wavelength that still ionizes air is about 1,9⋅10−51{,}9\cdot10^{-5} cm. Its frequency is the speed of light divided by the wavelength, 3×1010/(1.9×10−5)=1.58×10153\times10^{10}/(1.9\times10^{-5})=1.58\times10^{15} per second. Then Rβν is 8.31×107×4.866×10−11×1.58×1015=6.4×10128.31\times10^{7}\times4.866\times10^{-11}\times1.58\times10^{15}=6.4\times10^{12} erg, with R the standard value of 1905; the page prints 6,4⋅10126{,}4\cdot10^{12} erg.
  3. So J is at most about 6.4×10126.4\times10^{12} erg per gram-equivalent. An independent upper bound comes from Stark's smallest measured ionizing voltage for air, about 10 volts: 10 volts times the charge of a gram-equivalent, 9.6×1039.6\times10^{3} electromagnetic units, is 10×108×9.6×103=9.6×101210\times10^{8}\times9.6\times10^{3}=9.6\times10^{12} erg. The paper remarks that the two bounds are nearly equal.
  4. The footnote on Stark's figure: inside the gas, the ionizing voltage for negative ions is, to be sure, five times larger. The 10 volts is the smallest value measured, at platinum anodes.
  5. Why the smallest value is the one to use: the paper takes an ionizing voltage as giving an upper limit. A charge that has fallen through it had that much energy available to ionize a molecule, so the work of ionization cannot be larger. Each measured voltage gives a cap, and the smallest gives the tightest.
  6. Worked with the footnote's factor: five times 10 volts is 50 volts, and 50×108×9.6×103=4.8×101350\times10^{8}\times9.6\times10^{3}=4.8\times10^{13} erg per gram-equivalent, 7.5 times Lenard's figure. That is a looser upper limit, not a contradiction; the near agreement the paper notes is between Lenard's figure and the smallest voltage.
  7. Now the count. With light of one frequency, the absorbed energy divided by the energy of one quantum is the number of quanta absorbed.
  8. If each absorbed quantum ionizes at most one molecule, the number of ions cannot exceed that number of quanta.
nions≤Lh νn_{\mathrm{ions}} \le \frac{L}{h\,\nu}

The ionization count is at most absorbed energy divided by quantum energy, under the at-most-one-ionization assumption.

  1. The paper's stronger statement assumes exactly one ionization for each absorbed quantum: j=L/(Rβν)j=L/(R\beta\nu) gram-molecules for absorbed light L. It states the condition: the gas must show, at that frequency, no noticeable absorption that is not accompanied by ionization.
  2. Worked count: absorb 1 erg of light at Lenard's limit. Per molecule, one quantum carries 6.4×1012/(6.17×1023)=1.03×10−116.4\times10^{12}/(6.17\times10^{23})=1.03\times10^{-11} erg, so 1 erg is about 9.7×10109.7\times10^{10} quanta, and at most that many ions.
  3. Meeting the threshold makes an ionization possible, not certain. An unknown absorbed fraction or yield stays unknown rather than being set to 100 percent.
  4. The paper calls a test of this count by experiment very important, and ends there, dated Bern, 17 March 1905.
Explore the equations in this step

Read each operation, check its units and assumptions, or open the mathematical step behind it. These are modern teaching equations, not the equations as printed.

Explore the equation · Modern model notation

No more ions than quanta

nions≤Lh νn_{\mathrm{ions}} \le \frac{L}{h\,\nu}

number at most over one quantum.

Select a term or operation. In the formula, Down enters an operation, Up returns to its parent, and Left/Right move between siblings. Escape clears selection. Tab leaves the formula.

Explain this equation

Each term and operation, in words

No live values

This equation states a relation. No instrument on this page computes its terms.

Read the equation aloud in words

The number of ionized molecules is at most the absorbed energy divided by h times the frequency.

The absorbed energy divided by one quantum's energy is the number of quanta absorbed; if each ionizes at most one molecule, that number bounds the ions.

Model assumptions and every term’s meaning
  • One absorbed quantum ionizes at most one molecule.
  • These are modern teaching equations in SI notation, not a transcription of the printed paper.
Number of ionized molecules
Counted one by one. The paper counts gram-molecules, j. Read the prerequisite
Light energy absorbed
What the gas takes in; the paper prints it L. Read the prerequisite
Planck's constant
With the frequency, the size of one quantum. Read the prerequisite
Frequency of the light
Higher frequency means fewer, larger quanta for the same energy. Read the prerequisite
At most one ion per quantum
Energy that heats the gas instead produces no ions, so the count can fall short of the bound, never exceed it. Read the prerequisite

Every term’s units were checked when this page was built. That checks the units, not the model. This equation is written for this edition in modern notation, not transcribed from the paper.

Explore the equation · Modern model notation

A quantum must at least pay for one ionization

h ν≥Ih\,\nu \ge I

must reach .

Select a term or operation. In the formula, Down enters an operation, Up returns to its parent, and Left/Right move between siblings. Escape clears selection. Tab leaves the formula.

Explain this equation

Each term and operation, in words

No live values

This equation states a relation. No instrument on this page computes its terms.

Read the equation aloud in words

h times the frequency is at least the energy to ionize one molecule.

If one quantum ionizes one molecule, only light whose quantum is at least the ionization energy can ionize the gas at all.

Model assumptions and every term’s meaning
  • One absorbed quantum ionizes at most one molecule.
  • These are modern teaching equations in SI notation, not a transcription of the printed paper.
Planck's constant
With the frequency, one quantum's energy. Read the prerequisite
Frequency of the light
It must be high enough for its quantum to reach the ionization energy. Read the prerequisite
Energy to ionize one molecule
A property of the gas, set against the light's quantum. Read the prerequisite
At least, a threshold
Below it, no amount of light ionizes the gas in this model. That is the model's consequence, to be checked against experiment. Read the prerequisite

Every term’s units were checked when this page was built. That checks the units, not the model. This equation is written for this edition in modern notation, not transcribed from the paper.

Modern qualifications

§9 applies the same bound to gases ionized by ultraviolet light: at most one molecule ionized for each absorbed quantum, and none unless the quantum carries at least the ionization energy. The paper ends after this section, with its date-line. The footnote to Stark's 10 volts (J. Stark, Die Elektrizität in Gasen, p. 57, Leipzig 1902) adds, without a source of its own, that inside the gas the ionizing voltage for negative ions is five times larger; the comparison of upper limits rests on the smallest measured value.

Assumptions and limits: A threshold does not specify a yield

Assumed here

  • One quantum supplies the ionization energy in the stated idealization.
  • Only the absorbed energy counts, not all the energy that arrives.
  • A count equality requires one counted ionization per absorbed quantum.

What this does not establish

  • A threshold is a necessary energy condition, not a material cross-section or a guaranteed event.
  • An unknown absorbed fraction or yield is never silently taken to be 100 percent.
  • The energy budget does not predict recombination, collisions, or avalanche multiplication.
  • The footnote gives no source and no reason for the fivefold ionizing voltage inside the gas, and the passage supplies neither.

Earlier step: A coefficient suggests an energy element

Source context: German source · English · Interlinear gloss · Facsimile

References

A. Einstein, Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 132–148 (1905).

A. Einstein, On the motion of particles suspended in liquids at rest required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 549–560 (1905), §§1–5. Bibliographic pointer; this preview is not a source transcription or translation.

A. Einstein, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 891–921 (1905).

A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content? Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s translation or its pinned facsimile.

R. A. Millikan, A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's "h". Physical Review (2), 7 (3), 355–388 (1916).

26 foundation readings sit behind this argument.

The question we were answering:

Read this offline

Each chapter is one HTML file that opens in any browser without a connection. It holds the explanation at every level of detail, the lessons it links to, its source references and the numbers worked out when the site was built. It has no notes of yours and no running simulations. It is an explanation, not an edition of the paper.

Links to online sources still need a connection, and the interactive plots are not included. Every chapter you can keep