Translation

On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Generation and Transformation of Light

Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt

by A. Einstein

§ 9. On the ionization of gases by ultraviolet light.

We shall have to assume that in the ionization of a gas by ultraviolet light one absorbed light energy quantum is used for the ionization of one gas molecule. From this it follows first that the ionization work (i.e., the work theoretically necessary for ionization) of a molecule cannot be greater than the energy of an absorbed effective light energy quantum. If one denotes by JJ the (theoretical) ionization work per gram-equivalent, then we must have: Rβν≧J.R \beta \nu \geqq J .Gas constantSpectral constant BFrequency of the lightIonization work per gram-equivalentExplain this equation According to Lenard’s measurements, however, the greatest effective wavelength for air is about 1,9⋅10−51{,}9 \cdot 10^{-5} cm, hence Rβν=6,4⋅1012 Erg≧J.R \beta \nu = 6{,}4 \cdot 10^{12} \text{ Erg} \geqq J .Gas constantSpectral constant BFrequency of the lightIonization work per gram-equivalentExplain this equation

An upper limit for the ionization work is also obtained from the ionization voltages in rarefied gases. According to J. Stark[1)] the smallest ionization voltage measured (at platinum anodes) for air is about 10 volts.[2)] For JJ there thus results the upper limit 9,6⋅10129{,}6 \cdot 10^{12}, which is nearly equal to the one just found. There results yet another consequence, whose testing by experiment seems to me to be of great importance. If each absorbed light energy quantum ionizes one molecule, then between the absorbed quantity of light LL and the number jj of gram-molecules ionized by it the following relation must hold: j=LRβν.j = \frac{L}{R \beta \nu} .Ionized gram-moleculesLight energy absorbedGas constantSpectral constant BFrequency of the lightExplain this equation This relation must, if our conception corresponds to reality, hold for every gas that (at the frequency in question) shows no appreciable absorption unaccompanied by ionization.

Bern, 17 March 1905.

(Received 18 March 1905.)