Translation
On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies
Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper
I. Kinematical Part.
§ 4. Physical Meaning of the Equations Obtained, Concerning Moving Rigid Bodies and Moving Clocks.
We consider a rigid sphere[1)] of radius , which is at rest relative to the moving system and whose centre lies at the origin of coordinates of . The equation of the surface of this sphere, which moves relative to the system with the velocity , is: Position in the moving systemPosition in the moving systemPosition in the moving systemSphere radiusExplain this equation The equation of this surface, expressed in , , at the time , is: Position in the stationary systemSpeed of the moving systemSpeed of lightPosition in the stationary systemPosition in the stationary systemSphere radiusExplain this equation A rigid body which, measured in a state of rest, has the shape of a sphere therefore has in a state of motion — viewed from the stationary system — the shape of an ellipsoid of revolution with the axes Sphere radiusSpeed of the moving systemSpeed of lightExplain this equation
Thus, whereas the - and -dimensions of the sphere (and hence also of every rigid body of whatever shape) do not appear modified by the motion, the -dimension appears shortened in the ratio , that is, the more strongly the greater is. For all moving objects — viewed from the “stationary” system — shrink into plane figures. For velocities greater than that of light our considerations become meaningless; we shall find, moreover, in the considerations that follow, that in our theory the velocity of light plays physically the part of infinitely great velocities.
It is clear that the same results hold for bodies at rest in the “stationary” system, viewed from a uniformly moving system. —
We imagine further one of the clocks which are fitted to indicate the time when at rest relative to the stationary system and the time when at rest relative to the moving system, placed at the origin of coordinates of and so set that it indicates the time . How fast does this clock go, viewed from the stationary system?
Between the quantities , and , which refer to the position of this clock, the following equations evidently hold: Time in the moving systemSpeed of the moving systemSpeed of lightTime in the stationary systemPosition in the stationary systemExplain this equation and Position in the stationary systemSpeed of the moving systemTime in the stationary systemExplain this equation We therefore have Time in the moving systemTime in the stationary systemSpeed of the moving systemSpeed of lightExplain this equation from which it follows that the reading of the clock (viewed in the stationary system) lags behind by sec. per second or — to within quantities of the fourth and higher order, by sec.
From this the following peculiar consequence results. If at the points and of there are clocks at rest which, viewed in the stationary system, run synchronously, and if the clock at is moved with the velocity along the line joining it to , then on the arrival of this clock at the two clocks no longer run synchronously, but the clock moved from to lags behind the clock that has been at from the beginning by sec. (to within quantities of the fourth and higher order), if is the time the clock needs to go from to .
One sees at once that this result still holds if the clock moves from to along any polygonal line, and that it holds even if the points and coincide.
If one assumes that the result proved for a polygonal line also holds for a continuously curved curve, one obtains the theorem: If there are two synchronously running clocks at , and one of them is moved along a closed curve with constant velocity until it returns to , which may take sec., then on its arrival at the latter clock lags behind the one that has remained unmoved by sec. From this one concludes that a balance-wheel clock located at the earth’s equator must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock, subject to otherwise identical conditions, located at one of the earth’s poles.
II. Electrodynamical Part.
In conclusion I remark that in working on the problem treated here my friend and colleague M. Besso stood loyally by my side, and that I owe him several valuable suggestions.
Bern, June 1905.
(Received 30 June 1905.)