Translation

On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Generation and Transformation of Light

Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt

by A. Einstein

§ 1. On a difficulty concerning the theory of “black radiation”.

We first take up the standpoint of Maxwell’s theory and the electron theory and consider the following case. In a space enclosed by perfectly reflecting walls, let there be a number of gas molecules and electrons that are free to move and exert conservative forces on one another when they come very close to one another, i.e., that can collide with one another like gas molecules according to the kinetic theory of gases.[1)] Further, let a number of electrons be bound to points of the space far apart from one another, by forces directed toward these points and proportional to the elongations. These electrons, too, are to enter into conservative interaction with the free molecules and electrons when the latter come very close to them. We call the electrons bound to points in space “resonators”; they emit and absorb electromagnetic waves of definite period.

According to the present view of the origin of light, the radiation in the space under consideration, which is found on the basis of Maxwell’s theory for the case of dynamic equilibrium, would have to be identical with the “black radiation” — at least if resonators of all frequencies that come into consideration are regarded as present.

For the time being we disregard the radiation emitted and absorbed by the resonators and ask for the condition for dynamic equilibrium that corresponds to the interaction (the collisions) of molecules and electrons. For the latter the kinetic theory of gases yields the condition that the mean vis viva of a resonator electron must be equal to the mean kinetic energy of the translational motion of a gas molecule. If we resolve the motion of the resonator electron into three mutually perpendicular oscillatory motions, we find for the mean value E‾\overline{E} of the energy of one such rectilinear oscillatory motion E‾=RNT,\overline{E} = \frac{R}{N} T,Mean resonator energyGas constantAvogadro's numberTemperature of the radiationExplain this equation where RR denotes the absolute gas constant, NN the number of “real molecules” in one gram-equivalent and TT the absolute temperature. For, because the time averages of the kinetic and potential energy of the resonator are equal, the energy E‾\overline{E} is 2/32/3 times as large as the vis viva of a free, monatomic gas molecule. Now if some cause — in our case, radiation processes — were to bring it about that the energy of a resonator had a greater or smaller time average than E‾\overline{E}, then the collisions with the free electrons and molecules would lead to a release of energy to the gas, or an uptake of energy from the gas, that differs from zero on average. Thus, in the case we are considering, dynamic equilibrium is possible only if every resonator has the mean energy E‾\overline{E}.

We now make a similar consideration regarding the interaction of the resonators and the radiation present in the space. Mr. Planck has derived the condition of dynamic equilibrium for this case[1)] on the supposition that the radiation can be regarded as the most disordered process conceivable.[2)] He found: E‾ν=L38πν2ϱν.\overline{E}_\nu = \frac{L^3}{8 \pi \nu^2} \varrho_\nu.Mean resonator energy at a given frequencySpeed of lightFrequency of the lightSpectral energy densityExplain this equation Here E‾ν\overline{E}_\nu is the mean energy of a resonator of natural frequency ν\nu (per component of oscillation), LL the velocity of light, ν\nu the frequency and ϱνdν\varrho_\nu d \nu the energy per unit volume of that part of the radiation whose oscillation number lies between ν\nu and ν+dν\nu + d \nu.

Z=∑ν=1ν=∞Aνsin⁡(2πνtT+αν),Z = \sum_{\nu = 1}^{\nu = \infty} A_\nu \sin\left(2 \pi \nu \frac{t}{T} + \alpha_\nu\right) ,Radiation electric fieldFrequency of the lightFourier amplitudeElapsed timeLong averaging intervalFourier phaseExplain this equation
dW=f(A1A2…α1α2…)dA1dA2…dα1dα2…d W = f(A_1 A_2 \ldots \alpha_1 \alpha_2 \ldots) d A_1 d A_2 \ldots d \alpha_1 d \alpha_2 \ldotsProbability of the Fourier valuesFourier amplitudeFourier amplitudeFourier phaseFourier phaseExplain this equation
f(A1,A2…α1,α2…)=F1(A1)F2(A2)…f1(α1)⋅f2(α2)…,f(A_1, A_2 \ldots \alpha_1, \alpha_2 \ldots) = F_1(A_1) F_2(A_2) \ldots f_1(\alpha_1) \cdot f_2(\alpha_2) \ldots ,Fourier amplitudeFourier amplitudeFourier phaseFourier phaseExplain this equation

If the radiation energy of frequency ν\nu is not to be continually either diminished or increased as a whole, then the following must hold: RNT=E‾=E‾ν=L38πν2ϱν,\frac{R}{N} T = \overline{E} = \overline{E}_\nu = \frac{L^3}{8 \pi \nu^2} \varrho_\nu,Gas constantAvogadro's numberTemperature of the radiationMean resonator energyMean resonator energy at a given frequencySpeed of lightFrequency of the lightSpectral energy densityExplain this equation ϱν=RN8πν2L3T.\varrho_\nu = \frac{R}{N} \frac{8 \pi \nu^2}{L^3} T.Spectral energy densityGas constantAvogadro's numberFrequency of the lightSpeed of lightTemperature of the radiationExplain this equation This relation, found as the condition of dynamic equilibrium, not only lacks agreement with experience, but it also says that in our picture there can be no question of a definite distribution of energy between ether and matter. For the wider the range of oscillation numbers of the resonators is chosen, the greater the radiation energy of the space becomes, and in the limit we obtain ∫0∞ϱνdν=RN8πL3T∫0∞ν2dν=∞.\int_0^\infty \varrho_\nu d \nu = \frac{R}{N} \frac{8 \pi}{L^3} T \int_0^\infty \nu^2 d \nu = \infty.Spectral energy densityFrequency of the lightGas constantAvogadro's numberSpeed of lightTemperature of the radiationExplain this equation

Bern, 17 March 1905.

(Received 18 March 1905.)