Read · Special relativity: from clock operations to electrodynamics

§9 · charge and current

Follow the introduction and all ten sections, including field transformations, finite light complexes, moving mirrors, charge-current transformations, and the electron-force conventions.

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

Read the whole available argument →

Show me one example before the notation →

§9 · charge and current

derivation · Within the stated model

Neutrality and current belong to a frame

How can a neutral current acquire charge density?

ρ=γ(ρvJxc2),Jx=γ(Jxvρ)\rho'=\gamma\left(\rho-\frac{vJ_x}{c^2}\right),\qquad J_x'=\gamma(J_x-v\rho)

Primed charge density is gamma times rho minus v J x over c squared; primed longitudinal current is gamma times J x minus v rho.

The transverse current components remain unchanged for this aligned boost. For ρ = 0 and J_x nonzero, ρ′ generally is not zero. The individual charged species must be transformed consistently rather than treating J/ρ as meaningful at neutrality.

Charge conservation requires density and current to satisfy the continuity equation together. SR-12 compares these quantities and the total charge of a specified body. Integrating the same body over each frame’s simultaneous slice preserves its total charge; arbitrary open spatial boxes are a different comparison.

Show every step here: Neutrality and current belong to a frame
  1. Record both charge density and all current components.
  2. Transform rho and J_x as a coupled pair.
  3. Keep J_y and J_z unchanged for the aligned boost.
  4. Do not divide by rho when the original system is neutral.
  5. Check continuity and the boundary of the same charge-carrying body before comparing total charge.
Assumptions and limits: Neutrality and current belong to a frame

Assumed here

  • Use a physical charge-current distribution and a boost along x.
  • Track the same isolated body when comparing its total charge.

What this does not establish

  • Charge density is not total charge.
  • A neutral two-species current need not have a single common velocity.

Earlier step: Light constraints leave a scale to determine

Source context: German source · English · Interlinear gloss · Facsimile

References and source status

Newly authored explanatory preview in modern notation, with editorial and physics review pending. Both the kinematic and electrodynamic halves are treated, but this is not a German transcription, an aligned translation, or a complete critical edition. The source paragraphs, footnotes, acknowledgment, and date-lines are not claimed to be fully represented or reviewed here. Headings and argument units are editorial.

A. Einstein, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik (4), 17, 891–921 (1905).

A. Einstein, Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?. Annalen der Physik (4), 18, 639–641 (1905). External 1923 Perrett–Jeffery translation, electronically transcribed by John Walker; its notation was modernized. A reference for this explanatory preview, not this edition’s reviewed translation or pinned facsimile.

16 foundation readings sit behind this argument.

Keep the explanation for offline reading

Each HTML file contains the available explanation at every detail level, linked foundations, source references, and available build-time scalar results. It includes no private notes or running simulations. This remains an explanation preview, not a reviewed source edition.

Open the downloaded file in a browser. Online source links still need a connection. Interactive plots are not included. Browse saved-chapter downloads.