A derivation
An energy budget has conditions
When is emitted fluorescent light restricted to a lower frequency?
The 4 printed paragraphs this passage explains
- §7, paragraph 1: In photoluminescence, light of one frequency is turned into light of another. If both consist of energy quanta, each absorbed quantum gives rise on its own to an emitted one, and unless the substance supplies energy, the emitted quantum cannot carry more energy than the absorbed one: the emitted frequency is at most the exciting one, which is Stokes's rule.
- §7, paragraph 2: On this view, under weak illumination the light produced is proportional to the exciting light, since each quantum acts independently, and there is no lower limit of intensity below which light fails to excite.
- §7, paragraph 3: Exceptions to Stokes's rule are conceivable in two cases: when so many quanta are transformed at once that one emitted quantum takes energy from several exciting ones, and when the light is not like black radiation within the range of Wien's law, as with light from a very hot source.
- §7, paragraph 4: The second case is of special interest: radiation that does not follow Wien's law might behave differently in its energy even when very dilute.
With one absorbed quantum, no extra energy, and a single emitted quantum, the outgoing energy cannot exceed the incoming energy. Extra thermal energy or multiple-quantum input changes those premises.
If an event receives only , emits , and retains a nonnegative remainder, energy conservation gives a bound on the outgoing frequency. It is a consequence of the assumed event budget, not evidence that all fluorescent events have that budget.
The emitted quantum energy is at most the absorbed quantum energy in the restricted event budget.
Supply extra thermal energy or allow more than one absorbed quantum and the bound changes. The fluorescence laboratory's controls expose those extra-energy and channel assumptions rather than quietly creating energy.
Proportional fluorescence intensity requires further assumptions about absorption and conversion yield. Holding those assumptions fixed can make a weak-illumination rate proportional to the incident rate; the energy bound alone does not determine the yield.
Show every step here: An energy budget has conditions
Letters: the paper calls the frequency of the exciting light and that of the light produced , and takes both to consist of energy quanta of size . This explanation writes and , and hν for the quantum, with h a later name for Rβ/N.
- The event: one exciting quantum of frequency is absorbed and, on its own, gives rise to one quantum of frequency . Quanta of other frequencies and energy of other kinds, heat for example, may be produced at the same time. The paper holds that the intermediate processes do not matter.
- The energy supply: if the fluorescent substance is not a lasting source of energy, the absorbed quantum is all the energy the event has.
- Write the budget: the energy of the produced quantum plus all other energy produced equals the energy of the absorbed quantum.
- The other energy cannot be negative, so the produced quantum carries at most the absorbed energy: .
- Divide both sides by the positive number : . This is Stokes's rule, that fluorescent light does not have a higher frequency than the light that excites it. In the explanatory letters the budget reads as the formula below.
The emitted quantum energy is at most the absorbed quantum energy in the restricted event budget.
- Worked case: exciting light at per second, violet. Under these conditions the budget allows fluorescent light at , green, and rules out , in the ultraviolet. In wavelengths: the fluorescent light is at the same or a longer wavelength.
- The conditions are part of the result. The paper names where the rule may fail: when so many quanta are being transformed at once in each unit of volume that one produced quantum can take its energy from several exciting quanta, and when the exciting or produced light is not like black radiation within the range of Wien's law.
- The same picture makes a prediction about weak light. Each exciting quantum causes its own elementary process, independently of the others, so with everything else unchanged the light produced is proportional to the exciting light, and there is no lower intensity below which the light would fail to excite at all.
- The budget sets a bound on each event; it says nothing about how many absorbed quanta produce fluorescence in a given material. That yield is a separate question about the material.
Explore the equations in this step
Read each operation, check its units and assumptions, or open the mathematical step behind it. These are modern teaching equations, not the equations as printed.
Explore the equation · Modern model notation
No quantum comes out larger than one went in
carries no more than .
Select a term or operation. In the formula, Down enters an operation, Up returns to its parent, and Left/Right move between siblings. Escape clears selection. Tab leaves the formula.
Each term and operation, in words
No live values
This equation states a relation. No instrument on this page computes its terms.
Read the equation aloud in words
h times the emitted frequency is at most h times the absorbed frequency.
If each emitted quantum is made from one absorbed quantum, it cannot carry more energy than that quantum brought, so the emitted light is no higher in frequency. This is Stokes's rule, read as an energy budget.
Model assumptions and every term’s meaning
- Each emitted quantum is made from a single absorbed quantum.
- These are modern teaching equations in SI notation, not a transcription of the printed paper.
- Planck's constant
- Turns the emitted frequency into the emitted quantum's energy. Read the prerequisite
- Frequency of the emitted light
- What the fluorescent body gives out. Read the prerequisite
- Planck's constant
- The same constant, on the absorbed side. Read the prerequisite
- Frequency of the absorbed light
- What the body takes in. Read the prerequisite
- At most, not equal
- Some energy can stay in the body, so the emitted quantum may be smaller. The bound holds only if each emitted quantum comes from one absorbed quantum; the paper says where that assumption may fail. Read the prerequisite
Every term’s units were checked when this page was built. That checks the units, not the model. This equation is written for this edition in modern notation, not transcribed from the paper.
Modern qualifications
In §7 Einstein applies the picture to Stokes’s rule, that fluorescent light does not have a higher frequency than the light that excites it. He states when the rule may fail, for instance when so many quanta act at once that one emitted quantum draws its energy from several. The energy budget here is a modern way of drawing the same account; it says nothing about the inner workings of a particular fluorescent material.
With one absorbed quantum, no extra energy, and a single emitted quantum, the outgoing energy cannot exceed the incoming energy. Extra thermal energy or multiple-quantum input changes those premises.
What this relies on
- An event absorbs one light quantum and produces at most one emitted quantum in this idealized budget.
- No additional energy reservoir contributes in the restricted case.
- The light-quantum hypothesis is being applied to a transformation process.
Assumptions and limits: An energy budget has conditions
Assumed here
- An event absorbs one light quantum and produces at most one emitted quantum in this idealized budget.
- No additional energy reservoir contributes in the restricted case.
- The light-quantum hypothesis is being applied to a transformation process.
What this does not establish
- The limit on frequency holds under these conditions; it does not forbid higher-frequency emission in general.
- The budget does not predict actual material rates or spectra.
- A dense field need not satisfy the independent-quantum assumptions used in the analogy.
Earlier step: A coefficient suggests an energy element
Source context: German source · English · Interlinear gloss · Facsimile